'Lets Tax the people for the Government's mistakes...'

Up to ten former Guantánamo Bay detainees are set to receive a compensation package that could cost British taxpayers millions of pounds. The Government is ready to pay compensation to the former prisoners in settlement of a High Court action after two weeks of intensive negotiations, The Times has learnt. One former detainee is in line to receive more than £1 million after the Government agreed to settle the claim brought by former Guantánamo prisoners and others, according to a report by ITV’s News At Ten. With legal costs, the final bill for compensation could reach £10 million and one lawyer speculated that there would be “little change out of £20 million.”[1]

---

[1] F Gibb, S Coates, the Times ‘Taxpayers foot £10m bill for Guantanamo inmates’, 15 Nov 2010  http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/

Summary of Child Labour Essay (task for workshop 5)

Child labour arose as a solution to cheap labour cost for the production based sectors since the mid-80s and 90s. Surprisingly till date 1 out of 12 children is now a child labour globally.[1]

Currently there are many international organisations fighting back this cruelty on children. One of them is the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Initially ILO’s main instrument against child labour has been the Convention No.138-Minimum Age required for employment. Gradually the Convention No.182 prohibiting the Worst Form of Child Labour, like slavery, trafficking, prostitution was introduced.[2]

Unfortunately the ratification rate of such conventions in developing countries, for example in Asia was much less than in developed countries. Nevertheless the ratification of child labour convention have boosted up dramatically in the last decade.[3] Moreover, economists have taken further policies, to restrict underage employment i.e. to put total or marginal ban on child labour; also setting penalties for using child labour. Even then loopholes remain considering the fact that illegal employment activities cannot be monitored properly.[4] Furthermore, the government’s failure to implement conventions properly into their national legislations and domestic implementation of those legislations holds back the effectiveness of ILO.[5]

Besides the ILO the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) provides certain basic fundamental rights for the children. It ensure the children’s right to life, education, express their opinion, protection from abuse or exploitation and the right to play and enjoy culture and art.[6] In 2000 two additional protocols were introduced that provided children under the age of 18 should not be forcedly recruited into armed force, and the second, demands the states to prohibit child prostitution, pornography and sale of children into slavery. This ‘new’ protocols have already being signed by more than 120 states and are also allowed to be monitored by non-governmental organisations such as the ‘Save the Children’ organisation under Article 45a of the Convention.[7]

Although there are many nations which have signed this convention are bound to fulfil these rights and protect them, there is still violation of these rights, and proof of the fact is clearly visible around the world. This is a powerful struggle going on by the UN and other child protecting organisations against child labour, however, illegal child labour cannot be disappeared from one day to another.

---

[1] End Child Exploitation – Child labour today, http://www.unicef.org.uk/publications/pdf/ECECHILD2_A4.pdf

[2] The Effect of ILO Minimum Age Conventions on Child Labour and School Attendance: Evidence From Aggregate and Individual-Level Data http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6VC6-4Y4XCW0-1-5&_cdi=5946&_user=122879&_pii=S0305750X09002381&_origin=article&_coverDate=05%2F31%2F2010&_sk=999619994&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtb-zSkzV&md5=67d6419d9cdabef6859cd71daead1807&ie=/sdarticle.pdf

[3] Ibid

[4] Ibid

[5] Ibid

[6] The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Children http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/en/child-rights_9528.htm

[7] Ibid

Prisoners' Health v Prisons' Wealth

A strong argument made by the Chief Inspector of Prisons was the reason to ignite the spark for closing six prisons. Specifically, the words used to describe the state of prisons were ‘hellish’ with ‘filthy condition’. Taking these words in account, Kenneth Clarke prepares to enact a huge budget reduction at the Ministry of Justice. Officials are drawing up a Green Paper to overhaul sentencing, aimed at reducing the number of offenders behind bars. The move, a reversal of the previous Government’s plans to increase spaces from the current 88,000 to 96,000, will fuel unease among Conservatives that Mr. Clarke, the Justice Secretary, is leaving the party vulnerable to attack over law and order.

A big and risky step in my opinion, but, acceptable. Conditions of prisoners must be taken in consideration as they should not be kept in such conditions. After all they are human, not animals in a stable. The only concern however is if the rumors are true that about 10,000 jobs will be lost in England and Wales.[1]

posted by Ioannis Masonos

---

[1] Ford, R. & Sylvester, R., the Times, ‘Clarke to close six prisons in bid to send fewer to jail’,  November 6, 2010

From Brutal Death to 'Fair' Death..

How can this even be possible? We are in the year 2010 and still in some countries there is death penalty. No man can play God and doom another and force him to death; only God decides that. Yet, in some countries the authorities deem to enforce the medieval customs.

In Iran a woman named Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, mother of two children, has been found guilty for murdering her husband (which she did not commit) and adultery (with her cousin; but she did not admit). The actual murder was performed by her cousin, but even if she had murdered her husband, every human being has the fundamental right to life according common sense and the Convention on Human Rights. Since she was an accomplice to the murder, a more logical sentence would by life-imprisonment.

Iranian authorities announced that Ashtiani would be executed by the savage and brutal method of stoning, public stoning, but with the help and interference of the UK authorities, Iranian authorities are now willing to hang her instead of the first sentence.

My personal opinion is that all of these are nonsense and the UK should take a more serious view of the facts and try to stop the Iranian government from killing this woman instead of finding alternative solutions for the way this woman should die. The woman has a right to live and only God can take that right from her. In the USA the psycho killer Charles Manson has the right to live and this woman has not. Is this woman more dangerous to society than Charles Manson?

However, in Iran executions are part of their legal system and are performed in cases of murder, drug trafficking, adultery, armed robbery, apostacy and rape. I think that life-imprisonment is a more decent solution and I think that it is a tougher sentence than death, although it looks softer, because the murderer or rapist will live in a cell for the rest of his life drowning in guilt and then die, while with a death penalty he skips the torture of prison (which is like hell in my opinion).   

Check the links below for more information:

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/world/iran-stoning-case-woman-to-be-hanged-for-murder/story-e6frev00-1225931453022

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7940805/Iran-stoning-woman-to-be-executed-after-confessing-to-murder-on-state-TV.html

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/

posted by Ioannis Masonos